The most popular search term that finds this blog is, unbelievably, ‘Floyd Nolen Jones.’ Floyd Nolen Jones is the author of Which Version is the Bible?, a book I reviewed a few years ago. I read the book because I had recently been exposed to “King-James-only” types (otherwise known as “King James or else”). Dr. Jones’ book appears to me to be one of the top books explaining this King-James-only view.
Interestingly enough, Dr. Jones starts his book with a section labeled, “To the Reader — the Sounding of an Alarm.” Following is its text:
In the King James Bible, Isaiah 14:12, 15 reads:
How are thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!
… Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell.
However, the New International Version pens:
How you are fallen from heaven O morning star, son of the dawn
but you are brought down to the grave.
Indeed, the New American Standard and all the modern versions read almost exactly like the NIV (except the NKJV). Yet historically Isaiah 14 has been cited throughout the Church as the singular biography and identification of Lucifer [citation omitted]. In verse twelve of the King James, Lucifer is in heaven; in verse fifteen Satan is in hell, and the continuing context establishes that Lucifer and Satan are one and the same being. The new versions have removed the name “Lucifer” thereby eliminating the only reference to his true identity in the entire Bible — yet the change in these versions is not the result of translation from the Hebrew language.
The Hebrew here is helel, ben shachar, which translates, “Lucifer, son of the morning” (as is found in all the old English translations written before 1611 when teh KJB was published). The NIV, NASB et al. read as though the Hebrew was kokab shachar, ben shachar or “morning star, son of the dawn” (or “son of the morning”). But not only is the Hebrew word for star (kokab) nowhere to be found in the text, “morning” appears only once as given in the KJB — not twice as the modern translations indicate. Moreover, the word kokab is translated as “star” dozens of other times by the translators of these new “bibles”. Their editors also know that kokab boqer is “morning star” for it appears in plural form in Job 38:7 (i.e., morning stars). Had the Lord intended “morning star” in Isaiah 14, He could have eliminated any confusion by repeating kokab boqer there. God’s selection of helel (Hebrew for Lucifer) is unique as it appears nowhere else in the Old Testament.
Moreover, Revelation 22:16 (also 2:28 and II Pet. 1:19) declares unequivocally that Jesus Christ is the “morning star” or “day star” (II Pet. 1:19, cp. Luk. 1:78; Mal. 4:2), meaning the sun — not the planet Venus.
I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
Thus it must be understood that the identification of Lucifer as being the morning star does not find its roots in the Hebrew O.T., but from classical mythology and witchcraft where he is connected with the planet Venus (the morning “star”).
The wording in the modern versions reads such that it appears the fall recorded in Isaiah 14 is speaking of Jesus rather than Lucifer the Devil! The rendering of “morning star” in place of “Lucifer” in this passage must be seen by the Church as nothing less than the ultimate blasphemy. The NASV compounds its role as malefactor by placing II Peter 1:19 in the reference next to Isaiah 14 thereby solidifying the impression that the passage refers to Christ Jesus rather than Satan. But Lucifer (helel) does not mean “morning star”. It is Latin (from lux or lucis = light, plus fero = to bring) meaning “bright one”, “light bearer” or “light bringer”. Due to the brightness of the planet Venus, from ancient times the word “Lucifer” (helel) has been associated in secular and/or pagan works with that heavenly body.
Among the modern versions, only the King James (and NKJV) gives proof that Lucifer is Satan. Without its testimony this central vital truth would soon be lost. This fact alone sets the King James Bible apart from and far above all modern would-be rivals. Truly, it is an achievement sui generis. Indeed, the older English versions (the 1560 Geneva etc.) also read “Lucifer”.
The clarion has been faithfully and clearly sounded (I Cor. 14:8). If the reader is not greatly alarmed by the above, it is pointless for him to continue reading. However, if concern has been aroused as to how this deception has been foisted not only upon the Christian Church, but on the general public as well — read on. The story lies before you.
Well, I have to say, these first two pages did not greatly alarm me. Perhaps they should have, but they didn’t.
What I find interesting today is that with all the alarm Dr. Jones expresses over the omission of this singular occurrence of the name of Lucifer, there is not one single mention in the entire text of the repeated and deliberate omission of the Name of God, not just in the NIV and NASB, but in his beloved King James Authorized Version as well. Go ahead, read your Bible through time and again. It says quite plainly that those who call upon the Name of the LORD shall be saved. So, what is His Name? The God of the Hebrews makes a very big deal about names in general, but makes an especially big deal about His Name. But what is it? Just to be clear, is name is not LORD, although that is how it is typically translated. Sometimes, your Bible probably says Lord and other times it says LORD. There is a difference, but you wouldn’t know it from reading your Bible from Genesis 1 to Revelation 22. You won’t find it in your Bible, but His Name can be transliterated “Yahweh.”
The translator’s notes admit to what they have done in the NIV and the NASB. The NASB notes are particularly interesting:
In the scriptures, the name of God is most significant and understandably so. It is inconceivable to think of spiritual matters without a proper designation for the Supreme Deity. Thus the most common name for the Deity is God, a translation of the original Elohim. One of the titles for God is Lord, a translation of Adonai. There is yet another name which is particularly assigned to God as His special or proper name, that is, the four letters YHWH (Exodus 3:14 and Isaiah 42:8). This name has not been pronounced by the Jews because of reverence for the great sacredness of the divine name. Therefore, it has been consistently translated LORD. The only exception to this translation of YHWH is when it occurs in immediate proximity to the word Lord, that is, Adonai. In that case it is regularly translated GOD in order to avoid confusion.
It is known that for many years YHWH has been transliterated as Yahweh, however no complete certainty attaches to this pronunciation.
So, in summary, the Name of God is incredibly important, or essential, so we have left it out. Instead, we have translated His Name as the title LORD, which is, incidentally, how we translate one of his titles, so to avoid confusion, rather than translating His Name as Yahweh and his title as Lord and the two together as Lord Yahweh, we will translate His Name as LORD, his title as Lord, and the two together as GOD. Just to avoid confusion.
Deleting the Name of Yahweh from the Bible is far more offensive to me than deleting the name of Lucifer.